000 | 05172nam a2200637 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 22300415 | ||
003 | KOHA | ||
005 | 20240424202100.0 | ||
008 | 240403s2022 enka b 001 0 eng d | ||
020 |
_a9780367647803 _q(hardback) |
||
020 |
_a9780367647827 _q(paperback) |
||
020 |
_z9781003126249 _q(eBook) |
||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC _dTR-IsMEF |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aHD1691 _b.M33 2022 |
100 | 1 |
_aMcCracken, Melissa _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDefining effective transboundary water cooperation / _cMelissa McCracken. |
250 | _aFirst published 2022. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aLondon ; _aNew York, NY : _bRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group, _c2022. |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2022 | |
300 |
_axiv, 258 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
500 | _a"For my mentors" | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index (pages 253-258). | ||
520 | 0 |
_a"This book establishes a framework for defining transboundary water cooperation and a methodology for evaluating its effectiveness, which will contribute to more effective and therefore successful cooperation processes. With the increasing focus on transboundary cooperation as a part of the Sustainable Development Goal Framework, there is global recognition of transboundary water cooperation as a tool for improved governance and management of transboundary surface and groundwaters. However, there is not an agreed upon definition of transboundary water cooperation in the literature or in practice. This book develops the Four Frames of Transboundary Water Cooperation, which is a neutral modular framework for developing context-specific explanatory definitions of transboundary water cooperation in basins and aquifers. The Four Frames of Cooperation are legal, institutional, relational, and outcome. However, we need to move beyond defining cooperation to understand better measures of the quality and effectiveness of cooperative processes. The Weighted Model of Effective Cooperation presents a first step in qualitatively evaluating the effectiveness of transboundary water cooperation. This model defines effective transboundary water cooperation and operationalizes a method to evaluate the effectiveness of cooperative processes over internationally shared waters. Effective cooperation emphasizes the relational and outcome frames of cooperation while working towards equitability and sustainability. Together, the Four Frames of Cooperation and the Weighted Model of Effective Cooperation will improve the understanding of cooperation and encourage a detailed evaluation of the quality, success, and effectiveness of cooperative processes. This book will be of great interest to students and scholars of water resource management, water governance, and environmental politics. It will also appeal to policymakers and professionals working in the fields of water conflict, water diplomacy, and international cooperation"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aWater-supply _xManagement |
|
650 | 0 | _aWater resources development | |
650 | 0 |
_aWater-supply _xPolitical aspects |
|
650 | 0 |
_aWater-supply _xEnvironmental aspects |
|
650 | 0 | _aInternational cooperation | |
900 | _aMEF Üniversitesi Kütüphane katalog kayıtları RDA standartlarına uygun olarak üretilmektedir / MEF University Library Catalogue Records are Produced Compatible by RDA Rules | ||
910 | _aÇağlayan Kitabevi. | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cBKS |
||
970 | 0 | 1 | _aContents |
970 | 0 | 1 |
_aList of figures, _pxi. |
970 | 0 | 1 |
_aList of tables, _pxiii. |
970 | 0 | 1 |
_aAcknowledgments, _pxv. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1 _tUsing a common language for transboundary waters, _p1. |
970 | 1 | 2 |
_lPart I _tWhy is a consistent definition to measure transboundary water cooperation needed? _p13. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2 _tPresenting the two challenges: Defining transboundary water cooperation and measuring its effectiveness, _p15. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l3 _tDemonstrating the challenges: SDG Indicator 6.5.2 – Measuring operational arrangements for transboundary water cooperation, _p40. |
970 | 1 | 2 |
_lPart II _tChallenge 1: How is transboundary water cooperation defined? _p83. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4 _tA lack of consensus in defining transboundary water cooperation, _p85. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5 _tSimilar terms: Teasing out definitions of transboundary water cooperation, _p103. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l6 _tFraming transboundary water cooperation: A framework definition, _p122. |
970 | 1 | 2 |
_lPart III _tChallenge 2: What makes transboundary water cooperation effective? _p153. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7 _tMurky waters: Trying to define effectiveness for transboundary water cooperation, _p155. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8 _tUnpacking effectiveness: Developing a definition of effective transboundary water cooperation, _p176. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9 _tEvaluating effective transboundary water cooperation: A model for effectiveness, _p199. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_l10 _tA path forward for effective cooperation over transboundary waters, _p230. |
970 | 0 | 1 |
_aAppendices, _p243. |
970 | 0 | 1 |
_aIndex, _p253. |
999 |
_c37060 _d37060 |