000			06033cam a2201009 i 4500
003			KOHA
005			20240918160841.0
008			220225s2015 enko 001 0 eng
010			_a2014025868
020			_a9780415639408 _q(paperback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC _dTR-IsMEF
041			_aeng
050	0	0	_aNA2500 _b.C57 2015
100	1		_aColeman, Nathaniel, _d1961- _4author.
245	1	0	_aLefebvre for architects / _cNathaniel Coleman ; series editor Adam Sharr ; editorial board Jonathan A. Hale, Hilde Heynen, David Leatherbarrow.
264		1	_aLondon ; _aNew York : _bRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group, _c2015.
264		4	_c©2015
300			_axvii,153 pages : _bphotographs ; _c22 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent.
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia.
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier.
490	1		_aThinkers for architects ; _v11.
500			_a"To P, Z. and E"
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 131-136) and index (pages 137-153).
505			_a1. Introduction: Lefebvre for architects.
505			_a2. Utopia and a new romanticism.
505			_a3. The production of space.
505			_a4. Rhytmanalysis and the timespace of the city.
520			_a"While the work of Henri Lefebvre has become better known in the English-speaking world since the 1991 translation of his 1974 masterpiece, The Production of Space, his influence on the actual production of architecture and the city has been less pronounced. Although now widely read in schools of architecture, planning and urban design, Lefebvre's message for practice remains elusive; inevitably so because the entry of his work into the Anglosphere has come with repression of the two most challenging aspects of his thinking: romanticism and Utopia, which simultaneously confront modernity while being progressive. Contemporary discomfort with romanticism and Utopia arguably obstructs the shift of Lefebvre's thinking from being objects of theoretical interest into positions of actually influencing practices. Attempting to understand and act upon architecture and the city with Lefebvre but without Utopia and romanticism risks muting the impact of his ideas. Although Utopia may seem to have no place in the present, Lefebvre reveals this as little more than a self-serving affirmation that 'there is no alternative' to social and political detachment. Demanding the impossible may end in failure but as Lefebvre shows us, doing so is the first step towards other possibilities. To think with Lefebvre is to think about Utopia, doing so makes contact with what is most enduring about his project for the city and its inhabitants, and with what is most radical about it as well. Lefebvre for Architects offers a concise account of the relevance of Henri Lefebvre's writing for the theory and practice of architecture, planning and urban design. This book is accessible for students and practitioners who wish to fully engage with the design possibilities offered by Lefebvre's philosophy"-- _cProvided by publisher.
600	1	0	_aLefebvre, Henri, _d1901-1991
650		7	_aArchitecture and philosophy
650		0	_aVisionary architecture
650		7	_aUtopias
650		7	_aArchitecture _xPhilosophy
650		7	_aArchitecture and society
700	1		_aSharr, Adam, _eeditor.
700	1		_aHale, Jonathan A., _eeditor.
700	1		_aHeynen, Hilde, _eeditor.
700	1		_aLeatherbarrow, David, _eeditor.
830		0	_aThinkers for architects ; _v11. _932295
900			_aMEF Üniversitesi Kütüphane katalog kayıtları RDA standartlarına uygun olarak üretilmektedir / MEF University Library Catalogue Records are Produced Compatible by RDA Rules
910			_aHomer
942			_2lcc _cBKS _06
970	0	1	_aContents, _pxi.
970	0	1	_aSeries editor's preface, _pxiii.
970	0	1	_aIllustration credits, _pxv.
970	0	1	_aAcknowledgements, _pxvii.
970	1	2	_a1, _lIntroduction: Lefebvre for architects, _p1.
970	1	1	_tLefebvre for architects, _p1.
970	1	1	_tThe problematic of architecture, _p4.
970	1	1	_tLefebvre and architecture, _p11.
970	1	1	_tArchitecture thinking its own thoughts, _p15.
970	1	2	_a2. _lUtopia and a new Romanticism, _p18.
970	1	1	_tUtopia as the prospect of the possible, _p18.
970	1	1	_tRomanticism and Utopia, _p20.
970	1	1	_tGenerate and degenerate Utopias, _p25.
970	1	1	_tCritiques of everyday life, _p33.
970	1	1	_tThere is no alternative? Or, Lefebvre and Utopia, _p34.
970	1	1	_tLefebvre's other vision of Utopia, _p38.
970	1	1	_tDialectical utopianisim, _p42.
970	1	1	_tExperimental and theoretical Utopias, _p44.
970	1	1	_tThe Utopian prospect of Lefebvre, _p51.
970	1	2	_a3. _lThe production of space. _p53.
970	1	1	_t Problematic of The Production of Space, _p53.
970	1	1	_tFrom space to place, _p56.
970	1	1	_tOvercoming Cartesian logic, _p59.
970	1	1	_tRepresentations of the relations of production, _p62.
970	1	1	_tRecuperating the social, _p63.
970	1	1	_tRepetition everywhere, _p69.
970	1	1	_tSpatial codes, _p72.
970	1	1	_tSpatial practice/representations of space/representational space, _p79.
970	1	1	_tThe antithesis of systems, _p85.
970	1	2	_a4, _lRhythmanalysis and the timespace of the city, _p91.
970	1	1	_tRhythmanalysis and different space, _p94.
970	1	1	_tCollapsing dualities, _p98.
970	1	1	_telements of rhythmanalysis, _p101.
970	1	1	_tThe relativity of rhythms, _p104.
970	1	1	_tParis and the Mediterranean, _p108.
970	1	1	_tThe perils of capital, _p117.
970	1	1	_tThe rhythmanalysis and the architect, _p120.
970	1	2	_a5, _lConclusion: another scale?, _p124.
970	0	1	_aFurther reading, _p129.
970	0	1	_aBibliography, _p131.
970	0	1	_aIndex, _p137.
999			_c27060 _d27060