000			03694nam a22005415i 4500
001			u1420385
005			20211226174252.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			170703s2017 si | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9789811038457 _9978-981-10-3845-7
024	7		_a10.1007/978-981-10-3845-7 _2doi
050		4	_aK3150
072		7	_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLBB _2bicssc
082	0	4	_a341 _223
100	1		_aAzeem, Muhammad. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aLaw, State and Inequality in Pakistan _h[electronic resource] : _bExplaining the Rise of the Judiciary / _cby Muhammad Azeem.
264		1	_aSingapore : _bSpringer Singapore : _bImprint: Springer, _c2017.
300			_aXVIII, 278 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aInternational Law and the Global South, Perspectives from the Rest of the World, _x2510-1420
505	0		_aPart One: Law under modernization: foundational discourse -- Chapter 1 -Critique of institutionalist-functionalist focus of the good governance paradigm -- Chapter 2 - Law under capitalist modernization (1947-1960's) -- Chapter 3 - Law under socialist modernization (1970's-1980's) -- Part Two: Law under neo-liberal development: Rights for democratic deficit -- Chapter 4- The rise of the judiciary in a 'weakening state' (1990's) -- Chapter 5 - Law under 'good governance' (2000's) -- Chapter 6 - Conclusion and theoretical implications.
520			_aThrough a detailed historical and empirical account of post-independence years, this book offers a new assessment of the role of the judiciary in Pakistani politics. Instead of seeing the judiciary as helpless or struggling against an authoritarian state, it argues that the judiciary has been a crucial link in the creation of state and political inequality in Pakistan. This rubs against the central role given to the judiciary in developing countries to fix the 'corrupt politicians and stubborn bureaucracies' in the World Bank's 'Good Governance' paradigm and rule of law initiatives. It also challenges the contemporary legal and judicial discourse that extols the virtues of Public Interest Litigation. While the book's core analysis is a critique of the contemporary liberal legal project, it also adds to the critical tradition of social theory by linking political economy to a social theory of law. The theoretical aspect of the study is applicable to any developing society whose judiciary is going through foreign-sponsored 'rule of law' judicial reforms.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aPolitical economy.
650		0	_aAsia _xPolitics and government.
650		0	_aInternational organization.
650		0	_aInternational law.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
650	2	4	_aInternational Organization.
650	2	4	_aPolitical Economy.
650	2	4	_aLegislative and Executive Politics.
650	2	4	_aAsian Politics.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9789811038440
830		0	_aInternational Law and the Global South, Perspectives from the Rest of the World, _x2510-1420
856	4	0	_3e-book _zFull-text access _uhttps://ezproxy.mef.edu.tr/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3845-7
912			_aZDB-2-LCR
942			_2lcc _cEBKS
596			_a5
999			_aK3150 _wLC _c24794 _i1420385-1001 _lNATURE _mMEF-EBOOK _rY _sY _tEBOOK _u11/9/2018 _xSATIN _0ENGLISH _1KÜTÜPHANE _2SPR-LAW-CR _d24794
003			KOHA