000 04571nam a22006135i 4500
001 u1420288
005 20211226174248.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 170223s2017 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783319498843
_9978-3-319-49884-3
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-49884-3
_2doi
050 4 _aB65
050 4 _aK140-165
050 4 _aK201-487
072 7 _aLAB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW079000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aPHI021000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a340.1
_223
100 1 _aNeudorf, Lorne.
_eauthor.
245 1 4 _aThe Dynamics of Judicial Independence
_h[electronic resource] :
_bA Comparative Study of Courts in Malaysia and Pakistan /
_cby Lorne Neudorf.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2017.
300 _aXIV, 251 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 _a1. The Problem of Judicial Independence -- 2. Judicial Independence in Malaysia -- 3. Judicial Independence in Pakistan -- 4. Conclusion.
520 _aThis book examines the legal principle of judicial independence in comparative perspective with the goal of advancing a better understanding of the idea of an independent judiciary more generally. From an initial survey of judicial systems in different countries, it is clear that the understanding and practice of judicial independence take a variety of forms. Scholarly literature likewise provides a range of views on what judicial independence means, with scholars often advocating a preferred conception of a model court for achieving 'true judicial independence' as part of a rule of law system. This book seeks to reorient the prevailing approach to the study of judicial independence by better understanding how judicial independence operates within domestic legal systems in its institutional and legal dimensions. It asks how and why different conceptualisations of judicial independence emerge over time by comparing detailed case studies of courts in two legally pluralistic states, which share inheritances of British rule and the common law. By tracing the development of judicial independence in the legal systems of Malaysia and Pakistan from the time of independence to the present, the book offers an insightful comparison of how judicial independence took shape and developed in these countries over time. From this comparison, it suggests a number of contextual factors that can be seen to play a role in the evolution of judicial independence. The study draws upon the significant divergence observed in the case studies to propose a refined understanding of the idea of an independent judiciary, termed the 'pragmatic and context-sensitive theory', which may be seen in contradistinction to a universal approach. While judicial independence responds to the core need of judges to be perceived as an impartial third party by constructing formal and informal constraints on the judge and relationships between judges and others, its meaning in a legal system is inevitably shaped by the judicial role along with other features at the domestic level. The book concludes that the adaptive and pragmatic qualities of judicial independence supply it with relevance and legitimacy within a domestic legal system.
650 0 _aLaw.
650 0 _aLaw
_xHistory.
650 0 _aLaw
_xPhilosophy.
650 0 _aPrivate international law.
650 0 _aConflict of laws.
650 0 _aInternational law.
650 0 _aComparative law.
650 0 _aMediation.
650 0 _aDispute resolution (Law).
650 0 _aConflict management.
650 1 4 _aLaw.
650 2 4 _aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 2 4 _aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
650 2 4 _aLegal History.
650 2 4 _aCriminology and Criminal Justice, general.
650 2 4 _aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319498836
856 4 0 _3e-book
_zFull-text access
_uhttps://ezproxy.mef.edu.tr/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49884-3
912 _aZDB-2-LCR
942 _2lcc
_cEBKS
596 _a5
999 _aK201 -487
_wLC
_c24697
_i1420288-1001
_lNATURE
_mMEF-EBOOK
_rY
_sY
_tEBOOK
_u11/9/2018
_xSATIN
_0ENGLISH
_1KÜTÜPHANE
_2SPR-LAW-CR
_d24697
003 KOHA