000			04097nam a22004335i 4500
001			u1420208
005			20211226174244.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			170905s2017 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319644776 _9978-3-319-64477-6
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-64477-6 _2doi
050		4	_aKZ7000-7500
072		7	_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLBBZ _2bicssc
082	0	4	_a345 _223
100	1		_aRauter, Thomas. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aJudicial Practice, Customary International Criminal Law and Nullum Crimen Sine Lege _h[electronic resource] / _cby Thomas Rauter.
264		1	_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer, _c2017.
300			_aXVI, 261 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aIntroduction -- State responsibility and the criminal liability of the individual -- Nullum crimen sine lege -- The formation of customary international law and its methodological challenges -- The role of judges when determining customary international law -- Methodological approaches to customary international law by international criminal tribunals -- Relevant material for proving the existence of customary international criminal law -- Conclusion.
520			_aThis study analyzes the methods used by international criminal tribunals when determining customary international criminal law and to consider the compatibility of these approaches with the nullum crimen sine lege principle. In this context, the following research questions are of particular importance: Is there one approach common to all international criminal tribunals, or can different approaches be detected in their jurisprudence when determining customary international law? Do international criminal tribunals regard both traditional elements of customary international law - State practice and opinio iuris - as necessary elements for the establishment of customary international law? Do international criminal tribunals argue along the lines of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), requiring a high frequency and consistency of State practice that is both "extensive and virtually uniform"? In addition, the book analyzes the evidence used by international criminal tribunals in order to establish the constituent elements of customary international. It then poses the question: Do international criminal tribunals distinguish, as defined by Schwarzenberger, between the "law-creating processes" of public international law on the one hand, and the "law-determining agencies" as a subsidiary means of determining rule of law on the other? Assuming that they exist, how can different methodological approaches to determine customary international law be assessed in light of the nullum crimen sine lege principle? Does the principle require judges to apply the traditional method to establish customary international law as being based on extensive, uniform and enduring State practice accompanied by opinio iuris? Can the principle balance the desire for justice and the specificities of law creation of the international legal order with fairness for the accused? How can the law be accessible and criminal punishment foreseeable, when the underlying legal basis for criminal convictions, namely customary international criminal law, is unwritten in nature?
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aInternational criminal law.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aInternational Criminal Law.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319644769
856	4	0	_3e-book _zFull-text access _uhttps://ezproxy.mef.edu.tr/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64477-6
912			_aZDB-2-LCR
942			_2lcc _cEBKS
596			_a5
999			_aKZ7000 -7500 _wLC _c24617 _i1420208-1001 _lNATURE _mMEF-EBOOK _rY _sY _tEBOOK _u11/9/2018 _xSATIN _0ENGLISH _1KÜTÜPHANE _2SPR-LAW-CR _d24617
003			KOHA