000 | 07401cam a2201381Ii 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 260 | ||
008 | 141107s1965 xxua 010 0 eng d | ||
040 | _erda | ||
049 | _aTR-IsMEF | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aB395 . _bS56 1965 |
100 | 1 |
_aSinaiko, Herman L., _eauthor. |
|
245 |
_aLove, knowledge, and discourse in Plato : _bdialogue and dialectic in Phaedrus, Republic, Parmenides / _cby Herman L. Sinaiko |
||
264 |
_aChicago : _bUniversity of Chicago Press, _c1965 |
||
264 | 4 | _c©1965. | |
300 |
_axii, 314 pages : _billustrations ; _c23 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
596 | _a1 | ||
600 | 1 | 0 | _aPlato. |
900 | _aMEF Üniversitesi Kütüphane katalog kayıtları RDA standartlarına uygun olarak üretilmektedir / MEF University Library Catalogue Records are Produced Compatible by RDA Rules | ||
920 | _aBağış sahibi bilinmiyor. | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cBKS |
||
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tDialogue and dialectic: Plato's philosophy and the written word, _p1. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tDialectic in the phaedrus: The eros of the one and the many, _p22. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe description of dialectic, _p22. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tDialectic as exemplifield in socrates' two speeches, _p26. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tLysias' speech, _p26. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tSocrates first speech, _p28. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tContent and structure, _p28. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tDramatic setting, _p31. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe need for definition, _p32. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe definition of love, _p34. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe validity of the argument, _p35. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tSocrates' second speech, _p37. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tIntention, content, and structure, _p37. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe introductory section of the speech, _p39. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe proof of soul's immortality, _p45. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe myth, _p49. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tPurpose and structure: the dialectical problem, _p49. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe first section of the myth: the soul in its cosmic setting, _p55. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe distinction between the gods and the other souls, _p55. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe distinction between Mortal and Immortal living belings, _p56. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tFunction of the soul (I): to have a care for what is soulless, _p57. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tFunction of the soul (II): self-motion and the power of the wing, _p58. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe heavenly host of souls, _p59. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe divine banquet, _p61. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe ascent to the top of the vault of heavens, _p61. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe feast of the gods, _p62. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe feasting of the other souls, _p69. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe degree of destiny, _p72. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe human fate of the wingless souls and the divinely inspired madness of love, _p74. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe conception of love in socrates second speech, _p83. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tTruth and dialectic in socrates' second speech, _p98. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe third structure of the myth: the process of generalization, _p98. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe triparite analysis of love reconsidered: in-terralations of the parts and the whole, _p102. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe process of division reconsidered: the movement from abstraction and simplicity to concretenses and complexity, _p104. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe nature of Socrates' conception of love: the role of the multiple structure of the myth, _p107. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe dialectical character of the truth, _p109. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tDialectic in the republic: the simile of light and elenchus, _p119. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe account of dialectic in book vii, _p119. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe simile of light, _p120. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe sun and the good, _p122. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tIntroductory discussion: the theory of ideas and the nature of vision, _p122. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tStep one: the establishment of the analogy be-tween the sun and the good, _p123. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tStep two: perfect and private states of vision and knowledge, _p126. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tStep three: the sun and the good as causes of their respective realms: the definition of the good, _p131. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe first part of the definition: the good as the cause of the actuality of the act of intelligience, _p134. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe second part of the definition: the good as the cause of the potentiality of the act of intelligence, _p139. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe divided line, _p144. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe lower half of the line: sensible imaages and originals, _p149. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe line as a whole: being and becoming, _p154. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe upper half of the line: hypotheticals and ideas, _p158. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tSummary, _p164. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe cave, _p167. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe "geography" of the cave, _p173. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe "legislators" of the cave society, _p174. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe fire, _p176. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe journey of the released prisoner, _p177. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe journey up and out, _p177. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe return to the cave society, _p182. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe unity of dialectic: the simile of light and the elenghus, _p185. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tDialectic in the parmenides: being and the reality of discourse, _p191. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tIntroduction, _p191. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tSocrates and parmenides: The theory of ideas, _p197. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe first argument: of what are there ideas, _p199. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tWhat is the relationship of the ideas to the many things, _p201. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe second argument: the problem of participation, _p202. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe third argument: the third man, _p205. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tTwo attempts by Socrates to escape his difficulties, _p207. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe fourth argument: the ideas are thoughts that exist in a mind, _p208. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe fifth argument: the ideas may be patterns in nature which the many things resemble, _p210. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe implications of Socrates' two attempts to defend the ideas, _p211. |
970 | 1 | 2 |
_tThe sixth argument: how are the ideas known?, _p214. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe premises of the argument: the two realms, _p215. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe first consequence: the realm of the ideas is unknown to us, _p215. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe second consequence: god (or the gods) cannot known us or our affairs, _p218. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe conclusion of the criticism of the ideas, _p219. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tPositive results of the discussion between Socrates and Parmenides, _p220. |
970 | 1 | 2 |
_tThe eight hypotheses, _p222. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tTransition and introduction to the eight hypothesis, _p222. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tWhat is to be done about philosophy?, _p222. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe nature of the traning required for philosophy, _p227. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tParmenides' choice of an interlocutor, _p232. |
970 | 1 | 2 |
_tThe eight hypothesis, _p236. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe subject of the hypothesis, _p236. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe first hypothesis: the one that is one, _p240. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe second hypothesis: the one that is, _p243. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tAppendix to the second hypothesis: the fact of change and the conception of the moment, _p249. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe third and fourth hypothesis: what follows with regard to the others if the one is?, _p253. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe conclusion of the first half of the exercise, _p258. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe fifth and sixth hypothesis: what follows with regard to the one if is not?, _p260. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe seventh and eight hypothesis: what follows with regard to the others if the one is not?, _268. |
970 | 1 | 1 |
_tThe conclusion of the exercise: discourse and the one, _p273. |
970 | 1 | 2 | _tConclision. |
970 | 0 | 1 | _aIndex. |
999 |
_c11872 _d11872 |
||
003 | KOHA |