| 000 | 07067cam a2201537 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2020 | ||
| 008 | 150112t20132013enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a0199564167 (hardback) | ||
| 020 | _a0199564175 (paperback) | ||
| 020 | _a9780199564163 (hardback) | ||
| 020 | _a9780199564170 (paperback) | ||
| 040 |
_aGXR _beng _cGXR _erda _dOCLCO _dYDXCP _dGZL _dRCJ _dCGU _dCLU _dDLC _dTR-IsMEF |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aTR-IsMEF | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKZ6115 _b.P38 2013 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aPaulsson, Jan, _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe idea of arbitration / _cJan Paulsson. |
| 250 | _aFirst edition. | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aOxford, United Kingdom : _bOxford University Press, _c2013. |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2013 | |
| 300 |
_axviii, 309 pages ; _c25 cm |
||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tThe impulse to arbitrate -- _tThe legal foundations of arbitration -- _tPrivate challenges -- _tThe public challenge -- _tEthical challenges -- _tInternational challenges -- _tNational public policy in the international environment : avoiding the chancellor's foot -- _tArbitral authority to reject unlawful laws -- _tImages in a crystal ball. |
| 596 | _a1 | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aInternational commercial arbitration | |
| 650 | 0 | _aArbitration (International law) | |
| 900 | _aMEF Üniversitesi Kütüphane katalog kayıtları RDA standartlarına uygun olarak üretilmektedir / MEF University Library Catalogue Records are Produced Compatible by RDA Rules | ||
| 910 | _aPandora. | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cBKS |
||
| 970 | 0 | 1 | _tTable of Contents |
| 970 | 0 | 1 |
_aTable of Cases, _pxiii |
| 970 | 0 | 1 |
_aList of Abbreviations, _pxix |
| 970 | 0 | 1 | _aNote on Previous Work |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l1. _tThe Impulse to Arbitrate, _p1 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.1 _tFundamental Speculations, _p1 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.2 _tThe Arbitrator as Archetype, _p4 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.3 _tArbitral Virtues, _p7 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.4 _tDubious Historical Parallels, _p10 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.5 _tAmbivalence Toward Law, _p13 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.6 _tUntidy Realities, _p18 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l1.7 _tThe Nobler Objective:Good Courts, _p24 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l2. _tThe Legal Foundations of Arbitration, _p29 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2.1 _tMatters of Definition, _p30 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2.2 _tThe Territorial Thesis, _p32 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2.3 _tThe Pluralistic Thesis, _p35 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2.4 _tA False Start, _p39 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2.5 _tThe Pluralistic Thesis, _p45 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l2.6 _tThree-dimensional Reality, _p48 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l3. _tPrivate Challenges, _p51 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l3.1 _tJurisdictional Controversies:Who Decides Them,and When, _p53 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tKompetenz-Kompetenz, _p54 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tThe concept of negative effect, _p58 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(C) _tSeparability demystified, _p60 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(D) _tAmerican struggles with 'arbitrability', _p72 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(E) _tAn overarching presumption, _p77 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l3.2 _tJurisdiction Distinguished from Admissibility, _p82 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l3.3 _tThe Right to be Heard, _p90 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l3.4 _tSubstantive Errors, _p93 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l4. _tThe Public Challenge |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.1 _tThe Tension between Public Regulation and Arbitration, _p100 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.2 _tWhy Should Arbitration be Allowed at All?, _p104 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.3 _tUnduly Procured Consent, _p108 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.4 _tExcluded Areas, _p115 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.5 _tShould Arbitrators be Allowed to Apply the Law?, _p123 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.6 _tShould Arbitrators be Allowed to Decide Issues of Public Policy?, _p129 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tPublic policy and judicial restraint, _p130 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tArbitrators' right and duty to apply mandatory laws, _p133 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(C) _tIllegal contracts and public policy, _p137 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(D) _tThe finality of arbitral rulings on public policy claims, _p138 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l4.7 _tRecapitulation:Degrees of Arbitral Authority, _p145 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l5. _tEthical Challenges, _p147 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.1 _tThe Weak Spot, _p147 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.2 _tFitness to Serve, _p149 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.3 _tThe Limited Benefits of Disclosure, _p152 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.4 _tMoral Hazard and the Unilateral Nominee, _p153 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tThe worm in the apple, _p153 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tDubious assumptions, _p164 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.5 _tMotivation, _p166 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.6 _tThe Trouble with Dissents, _p167 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.7 _tBreaking Faith, _p169 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l5.8 _tThe Case for an Elitist Approach, _p171 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l6. _tInternational Challenges, _p174 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l6.1 _tThe Hubris of Monopoly, _p174 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l6.2 _tClashes of Culture?, _p178 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l6.3 _tInequality of Arms, _p179 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l6.4 _tOperating in Three Dimensions, _p183 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tThe necessity of invention, _p183 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tAn apter model for a fluid world, _p193 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l7. _tNational Public Policy in the International Environment:Avoiding the Chancellor's Foot, _p200 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7.1 _tRecurrent Problems, _p200 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7.2 _tConcepts and Nomenclature, _p207 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7.3 _tPublic Policy and Concurrent Court Proceedings, _p209 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7.4 _tPublic Policy and Courts that Invervene after the Award, _p213 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7.5 _tPublic Policy and Arbitrators, _p224 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l7.6 _tRecapitulation, _p229 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l8. _tArbitral Authority to Reject Unlawful Laws, _p231 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.1 _tApplicable Law Means More Than Statutes and Decrees, _p231 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.2 _tNational Checks on Unlawful Laws, _p234 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.3 _tThe Application of National Corrective Norms, _p237 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.4 _tTwo Illustrations, _p240 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.5 _tMatters of Legal Philosophy, _p243 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.6 _tPierre Mayer's "Realistic" Objections, _p246 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l8.7 _tTen Short Propositions, _p254 |
| 970 | 1 | 2 |
_l9. _tImages in a Crystal Ball, _p256 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.1 _tEmpowerment through Responsible Self-governance, _p256 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.2 _tSymbiosis of Judges and Arbitrators, _p259 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tAre hudges jealous of arbitrators?, _p259 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tCommon objectives, _p263 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(C) _tComplementarities, _p265 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(D) _tIndispensable dialogue, _p268 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(E) _tThe attraction of specialized courts, _p271 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.3 _tOpen Doors, _p273 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.4 _tDecline of Unilateral Appointments, _p276 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tUnderstanding the debate, _p276 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tThe special case of inter-state arbitrations, _p277 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(C) _tReasons to avoid unilaterals, _p278 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(D) _tIf we must live with them..., _p281 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.5 _tDesigning Legitimacy for "A Nation of Devils", _p283 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(A) _tTransparency, _p286 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(B) _tEngagement with the community of users, _p287 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(C) _tBarriers to entrenchment and conflicts of interest, _p288 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(D) _tStandars and sanctions, _p290 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l(E) _tAppeal?, _p291 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.6 _tResurgence of the Influence of Scholarship, _p293 |
| 970 | 1 | 1 |
_l9.7 _tVirtuous Circles, _p298 |
| 970 | 0 | 1 |
_aIndex, _p303 |
| 999 |
_c11236 _d11236 |
||
| 003 | KOHA | ||